News

Feedback on Seminar Papers

Written on 19.03.24 by Wouter Lueks

Thanks all for submitting your seminar papers. You should now all have received an email with feedback about your first submission. In addition, we wanted to share some common errors that we saw across your submissions. Rather than writing them 10 times, we're listing them here. I've also posted a… Read more

Thanks all for submitting your seminar papers. You should now all have received an email with feedback about your first submission. In addition, we wanted to share some common errors that we saw across your submissions. Rather than writing them 10 times, we're listing them here. I've also posted a draft document in the material section with more extensive writing / LaTeX advice that provides extra advice and background for the things we're pointing out here. (I didn't prepare this document for this class, but would love to get feedback on things that are not clear.)

Now for the general feedback. When writing an English academic paper you should:

  • Avoid the use of passive voice. So instead of saying "Method X was proposed by Blake et al." simply write "Blake et al. proposed X". Using active voice makes your writing more dynamic and easier to read. There are a lot of great online resources that will help you understand the nuances better.
  • Avoid the use of unqualified references (such as "this", "that", "these"). While it is typically clear to you, as the writer, which of the many antecedents you are referring to, that might not be the case for the reader. It is better to qualify your reference. You could for example write "this method" or "this tree" to make it clear what you are referring to.
  • In general you should use shorter sentences. In many cases your native language would permit you to write long sentences (for example, in French or German). In English this is much less common and requires a lot of skill to pull off. Fortunately, there is no need to write long and complicated sentences. Short and clear will help you get your ideas across much better.
  • In academic English, you should avoid the use of contractions. So do not write "let's", "don't", "aren't", "it's" etc. Use the long form.
  • If you are writing in American English, you should write "i.e.," and "e.g.," including the trailing comma. British English does not use these commas.

We also noticed a few LaTeX related quirks:

  • In LaTeX, write your quotes like this:
    ``To be or not to be''
    (notice that the opening quotes are different from the closing quotes). The writing advice document in the materials section has more examples.
  • When submitting papers for review, it is nicer to enable page numbers (e.g., for easier referencing). We forgot to tell you how to enable them. After \maketitle add
    \thispagestyle{plain}
    \pagestyle{plain}
  • Your references should be sorted alphabetically by the name(s) of the authors. Not in order of appearance.
  • When citing multiple papers in one go, use
    \cite{ref1,ref2,ref3}
    and make sure that you sort the references so that the numbers are in increasing order.

Finally for some specific content related advice:

  • Some of the seminar papers refer to the 2 papers you read as "the first paper" or "the second paper". Please don't do this. Write your paper as if the readers are trying to learn about the topic, but were not part of the seminar.

Resubmitting your paper. All of your are free to resubmit a revised version of the paper. The normal deadline is Friday March 22. However, we'd be happy to extent the deadline to Wednesday March 27. But, you must ask for them, otherwise we'll grade what we have on Friday.

Reminder: starting at 11:30 today (and next two weeks)

Written on 22.01.24 by Wouter Lueks

Just a quick reminder that for the last three weeks, the seminar will start half an hour later.

Reviews and Help Reading papers

Written on 27.11.23 by Wouter Lueks

Some of you told me that they sometimes struggled with reading the paper, and with determining what to dig into, and which parts to read more superficially. A good first place to ask is the Mattermost channel for the course (see the Materials section for the registration link). I've created different… Read more

Some of you told me that they sometimes struggled with reading the paper, and with determining what to dig into, and which parts to read more superficially. A good first place to ask is the Mattermost channel for the course (see the Materials section for the registration link). I've created different channels for each of the different topics. Feel free to post your questions there, or help answer questions by other people. If you have specific questions that you feel uncomfortable asking on the channel, you can always reach out to me and I'd be happy to help. I can also usually point you in the right direction for some background reading in case that is needed.

I've posted more detailed instructions on how to write a review for the follow-up papers. Remember that I expect you to submit 2 reviews during the course of the seminar. Please submit the reviews before we discuss the paper in class. It is important to form your opinion about the paper before discussing it. You are of course free to choose which papers you want to review, but it might help you to write reviews earlier rather than later.

Good luck, and once again, don't hesitate to reach out if you have questions. Looking forward to seeing all of you again on Friday!

Full Schedule and Topic Assignment Available

Written on 13.11.23 by Wouter Lueks

The schedule page now has all the topic assignments and the dates on which we will discuss these topics. Please note that we are not meeting on exactly the same day / time each week. Looking forward to seeing all of you next week!

New Developments in PETS

If you want to register for the seminar, you should do so via the central seminar assignment system.

Technology is everywhere. We carry extremely powerful computers, also known as phones, everywhere we go. We interact with friends, family and colleagues via online platforms, and a large fraction of the information we consume comes from online platforms. On the one hand, digitalization brings enormous benefits. On the other hand, it makes it almost much easier to violate user's privacy, to surveil large fractions of a population, and sometimes even to control or influence what people do and think.

In this seminar, we will look at privacy-enhancing technologies, digital means that can help counteract this reduction in privacy caused by increasing digitalization. We will read and discuss new and seminal papers to learn about new techniques and ideas in the field of privacy-enhancing technologies. You will learn how to critically analyze and present existing research papers, as well as how to write your own small paper.

Organization

Roughly each week, we will discuss a different topic. In particular:

  • Each student will prepare a presentation for their assigned topic based on the assigned (lead and follow-up) papers
  • For two topics (that students do not present) they will write a review and prepare questions for the follow-up paper
  • Students write a short seminar paper based on their assigned topic.

All students are expected to attend and participate in the discussions.

Topics

The final list of topics and potential papers will be determined later. But the preliminary list includes: anonymous communication (e.g., looking at Tor and more recent systems), private information retrieval (traditional systems, and blazingly fast new proposals), digital contact tracing, private set intersection (e.g., for contact discovery) as well as other foundational work on privacy and (digital) surveillance. Our goal is to give you an overview of exciting new research and ideas going on in the field of privacy.

Deliverables

During the semester you will have to deliver (some details to be worked out):

  • A presentation on your assigned topic (35%). The presentation should be between 20 and 30 minutes. You will have the opportunity to get feedback on your presentation before the seminar.
  • Two reviews of an assigned paper (2x 5%).
  • A short seminar paper based on your topic (35%). The seminar paper is due near the end of the semester. Provided your first submission receives a passing grade, you will have the opportunity to submit a revised version of the paper after receiving feedback.

You will also be graded for 20% on your participation in class.

Important Dates

We will arrange a time-slot based on the availability of the attendees and the lecturer.

Requirements

The course has no formal requirements but preference will be given to Master students in Computer Science and related fields. A basic understanding of security and cryptography (as taught for example in CySec1/CySec2 or the Security course) is essential to be able to follow the material in this course. Having taken the Privacy-Enhancing Technology class will really help, but is not essential.

Privacy Policy | Legal Notice
If you encounter technical problems, please contact the administrators.