I have uploaded a brief feedback on your first report on CMS (and added the reports on the google-drive link - for internal use only - please to not share publicly).
Evaluation matrix (based on page 5 of the presentation in the kick-off meeting).
1. Description of the content/main result of the paper.
2. Relation to prior work.
3. Review (comments on strengths and limitations).
4. Additional personal comments (any out of: comments on applications, future directions, judging writing quality, presentation of materials, etc.)
Each criteria is awarded 1-5 points (with the possiblity to gain max. 1 extra point in each category for outstanding performance).
The mapping of points to grades will be communicated later. In any case, a total of 20 (or above) will be mapped to the highest possible grade.
3 - sufficient (60%)
4 - good (80%)
5 - excellent (100%)